MacGregor DNA Project Blog update 2025
It has been a rather quiet year for DNA developments. In terms of the tests which have been available over the past couple of years there is nothing new. Y700 still remains really the best Y chromosome test around but only males can do it, and it relates directly to male surnames. What has been developed by FamilytreeDNA are tools for understanding a person’s male genetic past on the Y chromosome using SNPs (rather than the ‘usual’ STR results). STRs or ‘short tandem repeats’ are necessarily less accurate for genealogical matching because they mutate randomly – in some individuals hardly at all, while in others, mutations occur with greater frequency (reasons evinced have been age of father, diet, exposure to radiation etc).
However, as I will explore in a moment with an example in this blog, it seems that the relatively small genetic pool of results from those with male ancestry in the Highlands of Scotland means that some individuals have a large number of ‘private’ SNPs in their results – in other words nobody tested so far has a SNP that is shared which would make it no longer ‘private’. Familytreedna has developed a tool to use when two or more individuals share a common SNP, which gives an approximate date for when that SNP was shared. Last year I explored how this gives a dating sequence for family groups of those called MacGregor (or alias names) who descended from the Argyllshire MacGregors. SNPs (or Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) are points on the Y chromosome that occur and stay fixed (as is believed).
This year I was contacted separately by two individuals, named MacGregor, who currently share the same terminal SNP, R-BY3023. They are not related to the Argyllshire MacGregors, or indeed to the other main MacGregor groups (that is, from Rosshire, from Ireland and from near Perth). They do share that SNP with quite a few other individuals called Campbell, MacDonald, Cameron but most particularly, MacKenzie.
While one of the two MacGregors has a terminal at BY3023 the other is currently waiting for results of BigY which should prove interesting to see if he comes out with a closer match to the MacKenzies.
But that is where the problem arises and in part interpretation is severely handicapped by the incomplete (and sometimes non-existent parish registers). And that’s also where it gets interesting:
Taking one of the family genealogies I was sent, the nineteenth century line, thanks to census and statutory records, is well established, so that there is direct evidence for Hugh born 1822/3 – he gives his age consistently in the census records and when he dies in 1881 his age is given as 58. And, he is also consistent in claiming that he was born in Kilmallie parish, Invernesshire. However, there is no record of a Hugh being born in 1822/3 at all let alone to Angus McGregor and Catherine Cameron who are named on his death certificate.
What records there are for Angus in Kilmallie are as follows (I have included some other entries for what comes next):
1773
Angus/Mary Cameron John, Kinlochleven, 8 June
1774
Duncan/Florence Cameron Ann, Achintore, 5 July
1776
Donald/Sarah Cameron Marion, Inchrie, 28 Apr
1782
Ewen/Sarah Boyd Janet, Blarachern, 17 Mar
1783
Ewen/Ann Boyd Rachel, Blarachern, 16 Nov
1785
Donald/Sarah Cameron Donald, Inchrie, 20 Jan
1785 Angus/Sarah McMillan Flory, Blarmacfeltach, 19 Apr
1794
Harry/Betty Wilson Elspet, Maryburgh, 30 Aug
1797
Harry/Beatrice Wilson Robert, Maryburgh, 17 June
1800
Harry/Beatrice Wilson Beatrice, Maryburgh, 13 Jul
1803
Harry/Beatrice Wilson Archibald, Maryburgh, 30 May
1806
Harry/Eliza Wilson Catharine, Maryburgh, 9 Mar
1810
Ewen/Rachel McMillan Catharine, Blaraclurin, 23 Jun
1813
Ewen/Rachel McMillan Ann, Blarnaclerach [Blarnaderach] 28 Aug
1818
Angus/Catherine Cameron Ewen, Blarmacfoldach, f 8 Nov
1823
Angus/Catharine McGregor,[ - ], John, 5 Dec
1825
Angus/Catharine Robertson, Rachel, Blachorin [dist Fort William], 25/26 Jun
1827
Angus/Catharine Robertson Sarah, Badacheanan Corran, 18 Aug/8 Sep
1829
Ewen/Ann Margaret 19/19 May
1829 Angus/Catharine Robertson Ewen, Blarchoachan, [Corran Dist] 16 Apr/17 May
1834
Angus/Catharine Robertson Catharine, Blarmachfailan , 21 Mar/6 Apr
1839
Angus/Catharine Robertson Susan, Blarmacfoldach, 23 Jul/8 Sep
Key: father/mother child, place, one date = baptism, 2 dates = birth/baptism, f = in fornication
There is a tombstone inscription in the Fort William Episcopal Churchyard:
In loving memory of Angus McGregor and wife Catherine Cameron, this tombstone is erected by direction of their son Donald McGregor Achnacarry who died Banavie June 11th and was buried here June 13th, 1892
FORT WILLIAM [gravestone from GD50/233 in National Archives of Scotland]
Henry (McGregor) imo son Charles died 25 May 1811 age 12y 9mo
In the census record there are some entries that show an Angus:
1. 1841
Angus McGregor born c 1786 (possibly 1782-86 because of census rounding down), wife Catherine (40), son Donald, 14, daughter Sarah 8, at Blarmacfoldich
2. And: in Fort Wiliam [Maryburgh]
Angus McGregor age born 1791 (1788-91), wife Ann age 60, grandson? Peter a 5
3. And:
Angus MacGregor age 85 (1752-56), Ann (daughter?) age 30
4. And:
Catherine MacGregor age 35 (born 1802-06), Ewen age 10, daughter Annabell age 8, daughter Catherine age 6, son Donald age 4 at Blarmacfoldich
5.In the 1851 census
Angus MacGregor born c1783 woollen weaver Fort William, wife Ann born c1776
6. And:
Angus McGregor born c1779 widower, farmer Muirsheorlich, children, Donald 23, daughter Sarah, 20, son James 13
7. And:
Angus McGrigor born c1791, wife Catherine age 49 (born 1802), son Ewen age 21, son Donald age 14 and son Alexander age 6 at Blarmacfoldich
1 and 6 go together, 2 and 5, and 4 and 7 (3 is clearly dead by 1851).
But there is no Hugh aged c17/18 (rounded down to 15) in 1841 or aged 27/28 in 1851
There is a death record for Angus in 1863, a farmer? aged 82 (therefore born c1781) with parents given as Donald McGregor and Sarah Cameron, and he is the widower of Catherine Cameron – the informant being Donald McGregor, son at Auchintore. So, that ties up with the tombstone inscription, and therefore 1 and 6 in the census. Is this the same Donald who had a son Hugh in 1823? It doesn’t look like the the Ewen aged 10 is the same as Hugh as heshould be given as at least 15.
However, if the wife in 4 and 7 is Catherine Cameron that suggests that the wife for 1 and 6 is Catherine Robertson.
Look though at the names in the parish register – Sarah Boyd becomes Ann Boyd, Sarah Boyd becomes Ann Boyd and Betty Wilson becomes Beatrice: you can’t but get the feeling that whoever recorded wife’s names wasn’t too accurate. So, you wonder if John son of Angus and Catherine McGregor in 1823 was actually a child Hugh by Catherine Robertson. OR is that Catherine Cameron again?? OR is it Ewen because that is interchangeable, apparently, with Hugh?
I have included Harry in the list above because according to Joseph Foss he is related in some way (but again it all depends on the DNA connection!
I should say that there is a letter from Duncan in Blarmacfoldich in 1825 in the PD60 Central Archives deposit saying that his brother Angus is bearing a letter of recommendation from John Gregorson of Ardtornish and that the family had been farming in that area since Prescription - so that suggests that they were there a while before Rob Roy and his son James Mhor. The significance for this is that it is claimed that Donald father of Angus was the last child of James Mhor son of Rob Roy. That would be doubtful if they had been farming there before Rob Roy.
And where is Hugh – before he turns up in 1851 in Ballantrae Ayrshire aged 29 married with wife Elizabeth aged 22, son Angus 2 and son John aged 1 month?
The second family who are related through the early SNP BY-3023 (estimated to have arisen about 250CE [used to be labelled AD] may provide a clue. They also descend from an Angus – this Angus died in 1866 at the age of 68 according to his son, but on his marriage certificate (2nd marriage) in 1855 he says he is 50 and then in the censuses he gives his age as 45 in 1851 and 59 in 1861 so clearly didn’t actually know his age. But, presumably, when he said his father was Duncan, (a mason) and mother Margaret Fraser he knew that for a fact. We can find Duncan in the parish registers. Duncan was actually for a time in “Locheil’s Highland Regiment of Foot” and there are children born to them: Catherine in Paisley (however we cant be sure if this the same couple as he is a ‘threadmaker’ according to the record), a daughter (unnamed) born in 1799 in Boleskine and Abertarff , Invernesshire [bottom end of Loch Ness] (the father was ‘not near’ so the child required a sponsor), and then in 1805 the same couple (he is still a solder) had a son Duncan in Edinburgh. Angus’s son knew that his father’s father had been a soldier, but he said that Angus’s father was Angus not Duncan (however he also says the regiment was the 78th so that could be checked). Duncan was no doubt from the Highlands and since Lochiel’s lands include the Fort William area it seems likely that Duncan came from the same parish and family as the family of Hugh that was discussed above, but the parish records are incomplete, and as you can see what someone’s children thought their grandparents were called was not always accurate.
I know this was a long diversion but I wanted to show what the steps were to trying to find out the facts and how DNA can be used to confirm or deny a story, If you have followed the thread so far you will have guessed that Angus who married Catherine Cameron (1 and 6) was the son of Donald McGregor and Sarah Cameron but not entered in the parish record. The significance of this, as I noted earlier, is that Joseph Foss maintained that Donald was a son of James Mohr MacGregor, son of Rob Roy born in 1753 – more or less at the time James fled to France where he died in 1754. So, the DNA for Hugh son of Angus McGregor and Catherine Cameron would not necessarily show any connection to the Argyllshire MacGregors (always assuming Rob Roy’s line was legitimate) and the confusion of males with the same christian name creates a problem. In other words Donald born 1753?was not a child of James Mohr (unless Rob Roy’s line did not descend from the Argyllshire MacGregors.
Of course, there is one little fly in the ointment – that Hugh (not entered in the parish record) had a sister called Annabell (also not entered) – which of course was the name of James Mohr’s wife (Annabell McNicol). Wouldn’t it be good if genealogy was straightforward.? So we are still looking for a probable male MacGregor descendant of Rob Roy!!
For the second part of this blog, I wanted to deal briefly with the Greig, Gregor, and Gregory families (no matter how spelt) to see if there was any overlap now that a number of BigY SNP results are available. This process involved downloading and combining all the Y chromosome 67 STR marker data from the FamilytreeDNA results page for the several surnames and editing it so that only the kit numbers appeared. I then ran the number sequence through Dean McGee’s Y DNA tool to produce a grid which shows the apparent relative closeness of some family groups by the colour matching – note the relationship time is not necessarily correct as I asked for a high percentage of probability. The resulting grid is Fig, 1. I say ‘apparent’ because this seems to show the relative closeness of families with different surnames, but the dates start to go back into the past when the closest relatives of the same name are ignored. There would have been less colour if I had opted for a lower percentage of probable time when individuals were related.
Fig 1 name relationship grid. From these, 6 more related groups can be seen – the largest being Gregories.
A well as this, Dean’s programme produced a Phylip grid – effectively the above in another form - and that was uploaded into Daniel Huson and David Bryant’s program Splitstree (as usual) which produced a spider diagram of results as below (Fig. 2):
Fig 2: raw chart of kits for the various surnames
At this point I inserted the surnames attached to each kit number and then added in red the BigY terminal SNPs (Fig 3).
Fig 3: the grid name and Big Y terminal SNP data
From this you can now see the various family groups and more particularly the high incidence of relationship among some members who share a surname, BUT, also that others of that same surname are much less closely related. The SNP results suggest the common ancestor date, but again this needs to be treated with caution because the connection date could be a lot further back in historic time than it appears. It does seem that ARE some branches which produced different surnames (for example Gregg and Gregory), but their common root is far back along the line, potentially pre surnames. Other than this there does not seem presently to be a direct link between or among these different surnames.
As always, this is just my interpretation, but do feel free to contact me at richardmcgregor1ATyahoo.co.uk (substitute @ for AT). My thanks to Dean McGee, and the creators of Splitstree.
No comments:
Post a Comment